|
Com 314: Mass Communication Theory |
Updated: 20 November, 2002
The focus on this chapter is toward the premeditated use of media to influence actions of individuals. Note how your authors justify this focus, rather than on attitudes, values, etc.
Examples:
The principle of persuasion is that if some SUBJECTIVE factors change, a change in behavior will follow....that's the focus here. (Somewhat rigid standard...may be bigger than this.... especially over long term).
The focus on behavior allows for comparability between developing theories. The independent variables will be different, but dependent variable will be the same (change in behavior)
We really don't know WHY
THREE different theoretical strategies try to offer answers:
PSYCHODYNAMIC STRATEGY
(Emotions can't be used reliably, though emotional appeals are the most effective apparently in advertising....we just can't document it well)
Example: Cognitive Dissonance, developed by Leon Festinger in 1957. See you text for full explanation. [We have already discussed this in another unit.]
attitude: There is the assumption that if you know the attitude, you can predict behavior. (not necessarily supported by research)
THEREFORE, learning is the chief approach to persuasion in Psychodynamic approach....If women know they all can't be expected to look like Barbies, maybe they'll have a better attitude about themselves...
See diagram in your text.
Doesn't seem to work consistently and no one knows why! It is a strategy that's institutionalized as part of common sense knowledge even though evidence isn';t conclusive.
(I think I know why we can't prove it . People operate with dual sets of knowledge. One may be conscious and the other may not be. The second one may involve all that stuff we've picked up through repetition in thousands of hours of television and other media when we never thought about what we were watching. So we think we have one set of values and don't recognize that we may also have another. If we don't know we have it, we don't really take the time to reconcile the two and we certainly don't deal with the fact that we may have two incompatible values systems operating within us at the same time.
There may also..lots of emotional baggage going on....TOOLs are emotional -- hard to isolate and measure.)
|
Psycho-Dynamic Approach = LEARN --FEEL--DO |
SOCIO-CULTURAL APPROACH:
We all do things we don't want to do in culture because of cultural pressure:Kamikaze Pilots were NOT crazy : so much shame involved in losing the war, it was better to die than endure it...provided honor in negative situation
THIS is not LEARN-FEEL-DO, but rather
|
Socio-Cultural Approach: LEARN-- CONFORM -- or BE PUNISHED! |
Every group to which we belong has strong control over us...
"in some groups we may dislike every minute of the experience, but if we want to remain members, we must adhere to the norms of the group, play the role that is assigned to us, submit to the ranking system, and agree to the system of social control. These are the EXTERNAL FACTORS that shape our conduct..." (p. 283)
(Me in graduate school when highly pressured.....)
MODIFYING SOCIAL EXPECTATIONS TO INFLUENCE BEHAVIOR:
(IF we show heavier women in the magazines and on TV, changes cultural expectations......This is the argument made concerning symbolic annihilation....)
This has been used for many decades in advertising:
United Way campaign is example used in book.
KEY: the message must provide the appearance of consensus of the local group.
STRATEGY: (on p. 285)
Tupperware Party; Church revival...all are examples of this.. There is a social/cultural obligation to do something -- wouldn't be polite not too....
3. MEANING CONSTRUCTION APPROACH:
That KNOWLEDGE SHAPES ACTION is the premise of most behavioral science:
We get those pictures in our heads... Media "Cultivate" our beliefs about what it means to be in the culture and what different things in the culture MEAN
Discuss examples: The one in the book discusses placing a car in a picturesque setting with a woman galloping on a powerful horse....positioning, framing, emotional appeals?
|
Meaning construction approach: Persuasive Media Message = change meaning >>>>change direction of action |
The persuasive message provides for change of meanings. The meanings give us the motivation which directs our action.
This one seems to work some of the time, but not reliably?
Cultivation Theory can apply here. If the theory is right, and heavy viewers believe that the television world is real and then make decisions based on that perception of reality, their behavior is changed toward the "TV norm." Why? Because their perception of what is real or important has been changed .... Heavy viewers have more in common with each other than they do with non-heavy viewers regardless of racial or ethnic background. So the meaning of material things, what is "cool," what is appropriate may be changed......Of course this leads right into social expectation theory, but you get the idea. Alter the expectations (the meanings) and you may very well alter the behavior.
Copyright, 2001
Dr. Janet McMullen